A nearly perfect perpendicular parallax {a PC entry for the book}

a nearly perfect perpendicular parallax

It becomes of richer spirit to inject humanity into science than science into humanity.

.edewlogics.


A lethargy of a world away from a deeply diminished point, the sun, surrounded by darkening blue skies on a nearly perfect perpendicular parallax viewed with the naked eye, held the confirmation of a much needed space-theory. The perpendicular parallax produced a glossy diffused effect aligned in near perfectly lateral straight form on the surfaces of the paved road. That is, they had the appearance of scattered light aligned atop a leveled plane, all in trials for linearity. It lingered in my mind hilariously–this must be the parallel evolution scientists have been speaking of relative to all of humankind. More hilariously induced is the notion of perpendicular evolution in trials for linearity. But unlike the chanced parallax witnessed by someone in expectation of such as I was, the newly archived theory by the very same observer such as I am is divergent is in its trail against convention.

Was the event merely spatiotemporal and extemporaneous relative to a reasonable, provable universe? Was it merely temporal and time-elusive? Do we truly live in a purely probabilistic world. Whatever could be the limitations and delimitations of space. Was the parallel space against the perpendicular parallax authentic in relativity? What is the significance of the parallax and the parallel diffusion effect? There was a lingering of the effect of an expected phenomenon happening in real time which to this observer seem relative from space to space, all theories relating time to space narrowing within all reasonable premises. Why were they narrowing, harrowing for linearity in a constantly expanding vacuous universe?

Einstein and Infield repeating Faraday’s experiment on the induction of electric current through changing magnetic fields, state on the purpose of discussing distinct influences on the fields with relevance to shape and sizes, that is, space, “Let us imagine that the circuit in our last drawing becomes smaller and smaller, shrinking gradually to a very small circuit enclosing a certain point in space. Then everything concerning shape and size is quite irrelevant. In this limiting process where the closed curve shrinks to a point, size and shape automatically vanish from our considerations and we obtain laws connecting changes of magnetic and electric field at an arbitrary point in space at an arbitrary instant.” And of the temporal effects, they concluded, “The field here and now depends on the field in the immediate neighborhood at a time just past.”

In a state of disorientation, hostile relativity and homelessness, and having witnessed such natural phenomenon and the implications of such, this observer that I am is apt to ask important questions about special relativity, time progression, vector progression and so much more. Where is the time in my perpendicular parallax effect? Where is the time in my parallel residual effect? Is it in the perpendicular or the parallel? Where is the Period of the effect? Where is the Moment of the effect? Wherever could be the time just-past? And most importantly; what is happening in space, to space, around space, within space?

Space in this context I must distinguish as occupation-prone rather than occupation/space. The occupation propensity here is pre-determinable, and the occupation/space calls itself post-determinably. This definitions are important for my discussions on the relativity of both the perpendicular parallax and the parallel diffusion effect as distinguished from the source of the effect. The distinction also enables me to incorporate Einstein’s and Infield’s “here and now”, “immediate neighborhood” and especially “time” and “time just-past.”

I must note a possible contrarian mal-effect of the diminishing point thus induced. And here I will also retrieve a statement made by Einstein and Infield about an observer whose purposes will be exemplary for future discussion on both the time series and the space series. They wrote “An observer destined to spend his whole life in the rotating room {for the purposes of inertia}, and to perform all his experiments there, would have laws of mechanics differing from ours.” Such an observer will be induced from time to time in the series to work for the purposes of our aims and for the life of it, against it. It is in such mode that we must consider what may be happening to arbitrary points in space and arbitrary instants with time. This is the inception of the space series determined to be occupation-prone, occupation transitive, and occupation/space.

Noonday Marks (This is an edewzealous{Philosophically inclined} entry for the time series in the book.)

Noonday Marks

It becomes of richer spirit to inject humanity into science than science into humanity.

“Where do we find ourselves? In a series of which we do not know the extremes, and believe that it has none. We wake and find ourselves on a stair; there are stairs below us, which we seem to have ascended; there are stairs above us, many a one, which go upward and out of sight. But the Genius which, according to the old belief, stands at the door by which we enter, and gives us the lethe to drink, that we may tell no tales, mixed the cup too strongly, and we cannot shake off the lethargy now at noonday. Sleep lingers all our lifetime about our eyes, as night hovers all day in the boughs of the fir-tree. All things swim and glitter. Our life is not so much threatened as our perception.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Like earthquakes, rigors deep and profound burough true and unfeigned into the reigns of time. And there are rigors against the surfaces of diluted trends within diluted spatial-temporal domains promising divergence, variation and derivations which bear no rigorous effects. They are debriefed in absentia and barely make their marks. Noonday marks are treacherous and deep. They soar percurrently above perception as they tend the undercurrent for the resurgence of life as contra-perception. All things have edges that must retain their stance or push them to peril. Time is not a passerby’s plaything.

If it is in such a diluted spatial-temporal domains that time has a calling, then it has a presupposition. That is, we must assume it has a calling on itself which presupposes time. Thus, time passes against itself as it may, drunk from a “Lethe” as Emerson puts it so we may “tell no tales”. it can no longer be presupposed that it is the causation for the forgetful state. It becomes the forgetful state. The reigns of time here is in process that forgetful resurging void edged in recurrent percussion harmonious in line with a sandstorm empty on its own mark. It is that thing drunk with space without any true rigorous effect.

Time tells no tale it cannot witness. And if we linger along the edges of perception we lose the tale it tells and become the percept within the sandstorm, drifting in a monotonous cycle of dunes trying to find ourselves within events never self-defining, always time-consuming. The force is not life-sustaining but draining; the systemic energy is malevolent in higher cycles. The struggle, the conflicts are fast paced and pitched against events as time finds itself the witness. Here is the beginning of the time series with keen and hopelessly incessant appeal, with time, the tell-tale witness, event, the tell-tall drifter, and the observer.

Do I freely brand my being with rigors deep and profound and brace myself for all possible pain-bearing but true repercussion and percussion of noonday marks? Do I re-drink the “Lethe” like some red rink constantly edged out and lost to existence and predesignate consciousness, find the out of sight stair and climb it, retrace my steps to find a different route or drift with the empty percussion glorious while harmonious and undefined?

TIME, THE UNHOURLY SYNDROME(THIS IS A PC {PHYSICS AND COMPUTATION} ENTRY FOR THE BOOK)

THE UNHOURLY SYNDROME

It becomes of richer spirit to inject humanity into science than science into humanity.

.edewlogics.

A lie can hardly be contained for long in natural spatial spans neither in time or space. It will cycle without significant presence, lingering superabundantly like some surrogate in postnatal conception. Its foundations will be referential however its countenance or disclosure. And its time will foster ill-obscurity of insignificant peripheral excesses without correlative marks.

Einstein must have reckoned Newton missed the relevant mark woefully when he disregarded time in reckoning the force between two bodies. He asks of it “The force has to pass from one body to another in no time?” He further states that “…motion with infinite speed cannot mean much to any reasonable person…”And with that I decided to make this entry in physics and computations as I discuss a VB.NET program I will title. “Time: the unhourly syndrome.”

I will state my convictions about time over time as someone not merely pulled along as a string without its relevant fabric. Here I find it very interesting that the two men are quite right, at the same time. There is the conception and there is the perception. But for the moment, the perception of time relative to earth developed mainly because of the sun’s relativity with earth. If there is no such perception, that is, no such relativity, there is no such perception or conception.

Armed with this fact, it is impossible not to wonder about the relativity of other celestial entities, other consistutions essentially conceivable and perceptible with what we refer to conceptually and perceptively as ‘time.” It breaks other constitutions down in ways yet un-conceived or rather ill-perceived.

It brings up yet un-reckoned notions of time and all possible questions relative to time in science and computations for all uses of time. Here is a first code in the series that will discuss my conception of time over time- a time program that only intakes seconds and only delivers minutes. If the program is run, the output which has six digits can only function half the time and half the digits. Anything after “360″ seconds is stuck in as much the infinite and therefore unreasonable in the “conceivable modelling” Einstein once referred to.

Time, the unhourly syndrome
Imports System
Public Module Module1
     Public Sub Main()
          Dim userName as string = Nothing
          Dim O as string = nothing
          Dim temp_variable1 as string = nothing
          Dim temp_variable2 as string = nothing
        console.WriteLine ("What is your name?")
          userName = Console.ReadLine()
          console.WriteLine ("What says the time in seconds?")
        O = Console.ReadLine()
                  if (O < 60 and O < 10 ) then
                       Console.WriteLine("00:00:0"+ O)
                  elseif (O >= 10 and O < 60) then
                        Console.WriteLine("00:00:"+ O)
                  elseif (O > 60 and O < 70) then
                        Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                        dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                        tv1 = O-60
                        tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                        Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0"+ tv2 + ":0" + tv1)
                  elseif (O >= 70 and O < 120) then
                        Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                        dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                        tv1 = O-60
                        tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                        Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                   elseif(O >= 120 and O < 130) then
                         Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                         dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                         tv1 = O-120
                         tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                         Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0"+ tv2 + ":" + "0" + tv1)
                    elseif (O >= 130 and O < 180) then
                         Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                         dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                         tv1 = O-120
                         tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                         Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                     elseif(O >= 180 and O < 190) then
                         Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                         dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                         tv1 = O-180
                         tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                         Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + "0" + tv1)
                     elseif(O >= 190 and O < 240) then
                          Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                          dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                           tv1 = O-180
                           tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                           Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                      elseif(O >= 240 and O < 250) then
                           Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                           dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                           tv1 = O-240
                           tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                           Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + "0" + tv1)
                       elseif(O >= 250 and O < 300) then
                           Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                           dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                            tv1 = O-240
                            tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                            Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                       elseif(O >= 300 and O < 310) then
                             Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                             dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                             tv1 = O-300
                             tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                             Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + "0" + tv1)
                          elseif(O >= 310 and O < 360) then
                              Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                              dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                              tv1 = O-300
                              tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                            Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                           elseif(O = 360) then
                               Dim tv1 as string = temp_variable1
                               dim tv2 as string = temp_variable2
                               tv1 = "0" + "0"
                               tv2 = math.floor(O/60)
                               Console.WriteLine("00:" + "0" + tv2 + ":" + tv1)
                            End If
                End Sub
End Module

EDGING ON PROBABILITIES : THE SCIENCE OF NONENTITIES (THIS IS A PC {PHYSICS AND COMPUTATION} ENTRY FOR THE BOOK)

Without hurry, without rest, the human spirit goes forth from the beginning to embody every faculty, every thought, every emotion, which belongs to it, in appropriate events.

RALPH WALDO EMERSON

The absurd is some agent of speed derived within some error devoid of particulate origin or vectored space. Einstein referred to it as “vacuous space” in his theory of relativity. The expansion and possible derivatives of this space will be discussed in this collection of essays. The absurd projects its own relativity sequences. And the infeasible corners the absurd when entity-related-spatial-temporal events, sparse-out, digitized, edged out, decentralized, becomes the crime of her own victimization. Thus becoming a thing without the human spirit, with hurry, without rest. There is the necessity for individuality of the human spirit or there will be no appropriate event in lineage, no history to speak of.

It becomes of richer spirit to inject humanity into science than science into humanity.

.edewlogics.

Sanity stops to regress its steps, losing the moment of integrated embodiment to nothing at all in her history. And insanity welcomes a new synthetic faculty bordering that most indefinite fabric of catastrophic human event.

This projected fabric eventuates the seeming progressive notion of the fast life on the fast lane being some sort of progressive fast lane. And the backwash of this projected reality is not human history at all but rather a progressive fast-crash lane. It is a history of the machines; a database without a base for some factorized exponent.

I did some database design in sql with sqlite recently and Emerson’s words echoed. A history without a spatial-time-event relatable enitity is no history at all and there is no external event made relatable in the patial-time-event span capable of deregulating the particulate spatial-time-event pathway without being pasticulate in it.

The particle without hurry is the very same particle without rest or there is no such relative particulate. In fact, I am certain of it as I will further expantiate in the body of this collection of essays, this fabric of externality projectable, made up, and ill-differentiable, this collection of projected evolution states, some made up form of religion for the sciences. Without history or source differentiable, hurrying or at rest, something projected particulate is nothing at all unless, that is it is made quantum, which is a different sub ject for a different essay entry in this collection. The key phrase to note going forward in the body of this book is “made differentiable”.

To inject some intuition into this projection, here is an entry from the database design sql program that ensures that the sql probability with the same set of numbers ensures that there is the probability that there is someone that knows everybody and ensures that everybody knows everybody with the very same probability number “78”. The eventuality was made possible with the probability cross join statement within the program, which also ensures that everybody does not know somebody, in fact, knows nobody at all. Oxymoronic? Much worse! In other words, there is no history whatsoever linking somebody to everybody or everybody to somebody. Thus the events linking the two quantitative identity paradigm, neither qualitative, is in fact a farce, and nothing short of a fundamental fluke should be self-evident in the program.

An excerpt from the program:

-- 8 #7

select”;
select “EVERYBODY EVERYBODY AND EVERYBODY NOT EVERYBODY AND SOMETHING LIKE THAT”;
select”;

select count(empid)
from emp
cross join (customers);

select count(customerid)
from customers
cross join (emp);

OUTPUT

78

78

NOTE
–MATHEMATICALLY SPEAKING
— EVERYBODY+EVERYBODY != EVERYBODY X EVERYBODY
— AND CANT INTERACT WITH SELF
— THEREFORE {(13+6) – 1}! = 18!
— = 6.40237371×10^15
— THUS EVERYBODY INTERACTING WITH EVERYBODY WITHOUT INTERACTING WITH SOMEBODY
— = (18!)/78
— =8.20817142×10^13
ENDNOTE