I can’t believe BRITONS WROTE THIS. OR MAYBE I CAN. It’s been quite a while since I read something someone else wrote worth sharing at all. It reminds me of that solemn pact I made that if I can not do something or have no idea how it’s done in every aspect of business, I will never offer anything I publish for sale or pay anyone to work for me. I TRUST A ROBOT OR AI TO DO A BETTER AND YES A MORE HUMANE JOB SELLING SOMETHING THAN THE LIKES OF GOOGLE AND AMAZON. Now I am not MARXIST in perspective but I respect labor as much as he does. A FEW THINGS I FIND INTERESTING ABOUT THE ARTICLE:
When people demand a revolution, minor reforms often gain support because they can be framed in such a way that they appear to simultaneously address the concerns of the critics while maintaining the status quo. This is exactly what is happening in economics,” he says.
It seems it is still seen as radical to analyse the flows of money in the world as if much of it was stolen, and how that skews investors’ decisions. But it’s not radical: it’s a fact.
Very well said, but what I find most interesting is the importance of information relationship. The excerpt HERE:
The world is full of asymmetric power and information relationships, and Core reflects this.
Nonetheless, Joe Earle, chief executive of the charity Economy, says Core puts a gloss on a course that still puts maths first and critical thinking second.
Now, I personally believe core is the same shit, recirculated, regurgitated, tweak and feed in proposed better version, an AI IS AN AI, A ROBOT A ROBOT, MORE AUTOMATA, LESS AUTOMATA, WHATEVER ELSE, SAME SHIT. Information relationships on the other hand is very essential and qualifying rather than as CORE DOES, Quantifying. Unfortunately, they are not one and the same.
edewlogics.com 