Inspecting and studying the daily attributions and procedural affirmations of the earthly spatial “sky”, I find that the clouds are disposable aspects of its operational expressions. They are not real in a sense. At least something real can sustain and retain as aspect of itself as itself in the least. This thought brings about the questions of retain-ability, transverse-ability and the necessary fulfilling qualities for the pro-axial and abaxial spatial translocation of essential mass into focus.
“Clouds are retainable”, cannot be sustained as a premise because they are not. “Clouds are not retainable” becomes premise and “They must die,” becomes a probable consequent premise. A consequent in this case is an incidental or product effect due to a cause. Here I may go on and on about this issue but I will rather not. It is for a different entry. The important aspect of this intro is in the investment understanding of space as an effect in essence product, byproduct etc. and to bring the spatial translocation of essential mass into focus.
From the implication of clouds, it is important to illustrate how animation is a necessary component of both life and death. The pronunciation of life becomes as important as the renunciation of death. The ill recognition of one leads to the ill recognition of the other and vice versa. The doubling down of the two is an ultimate scientific catastrophe pronouncing life—like some shadowing of a consequent penumbra, that outer shadowing of the darker sunspot.
And the consequences of our discussion in physics? The interbreeding of belief systems within the sciences interbreeds subtle destructive ideas which feeds the foundational “reasoning pot” of interactivity within society. And in hardened and unchecked states these “reasoning pots” may stand as excuses for executing on the destructive premises supposed upon “scientific and universal truths”.
True insanity does look good in science because it has receptive ears and accepted precedence. From my perspective it may be because there is no active observer over the microscope or a real beholder on the problematic situation. What if some insanity causing death is scientifically correct? Whatever could bring science to the state of being the “cause of death” without ever realizing its most primal responsibility, the pronunciation of life?
There was the recent case of a citizen shooting of a police officer seated in his patrol car. The reason this is important is that the police officer was shot ten times, the killer counted ten and his head was the target. Taking into account the position of the killer relative to the officer and the human anatomy of location relevant, I drew up a 2D representation of the mechanics involved
edewlogics.com 