Never stood a rational chance

My readers, I want to briefly talk about a case the supreme court deliberated on, a case people like me should have a voice for on a decent non prejudicial platform, a human and humane platform, acas that affects ordinary human lives and therefore matters to me. It is a case I wish I will read more often than the shit I read, one we would have discussed on SBE. I did say we need a revolution.  So this case from Georgia had this black woman adopting a black boy. The boy was more than a handful and was later diagnosed with ills and eventually schizophrenia. After the mental hospital released him because they felt all was fine, he killed his adopting mother, stabbing her about 50 times.

Now simply put, of three major counts against the boy, a Georgia jury found him not guilty by reason of insanity on the first and guilty in the other two giving him life in prison for it. If you know much about law, you already know this is crazy and an appeal was inevitable. The Georgia Supreme court threw out the 3 convictions and ordered a new trial. The nation’s supreme court got the case. They eventually ruled against a new trial. What is crazy about this case? The jurors’ verdicts are completely irrational. Nobody who understood law and how it truly works would have given that verdict.

My perspective on this is simple. The double Jeopardy hardly applied when the verdict itself convicted itself. It is  completely irrational for the first premise–an instance of insanity–to have gone anywhere nevertheless near two verdicts of guilt. The first count charge never stood a chance because of the instance of insanity. The second and third counts never stood a chance from the first instance of insanity. In simpler words my readers, the “reasonable doubt” to nullify this irrational case was embedded in the verdicts. Never stood a rational chance.

My readers, wherever you are in the world, I will never want to hide a book like CTTD in print versions behind some backdoor at a Bluesie jazz comedy fest. Do not make me something other than human and humane with my books. Give your support. CTTD has been a lesson in law. Justice must be achieved. Give your support and hold on to the relativity.

Raising one’s hands down existentially once is a definite degenerative disorder ( a cluster B factor). The degeneracy of raising one’s hands down existentially twice should be listed as a DSM 5 genetic and mental disorder, and the inability to raise one’s hands existentially as “imbecilic throughput schizophrenia”—ade ronke

On January 7th 2026, I was stalked, harassed and arrested by the state police. The reasons for this is, in my view, the intellectual and daring proclivities in my book, A Case in Point. There are other reasons to be stated in this book. If every indication of my life doesn’t suggest this to you my readers, it is calling it: if I wasn’t to be me. would I not be dead? But I am cognizantly alive by my own recognizance. In other words I was arrested for being who and what I am. What is to follow is false imprisonment, and a true story of great injustice and ceaseless attempts at cover up while I meet unsavory criminals along the way. If this hadn’t happened to me, I couldn’t have conceived of it. It happened to me. I must go beyond mere conceptions. PLEASE SUPPORT THIS BOOK FOR PUBLICATION

BOOK ALBUMAIN’T THAT HOW IT GOES–music mood -1 * Nothing’s Deader(than love) 2 * Bulletproof.

PLEASE DONATE TO SUPPORT THE FREE BOOKS FOR LIFE CAUSE
You may choose to donate whatever you may through lomopeju@protonmail.com PayPal handle. You may also support by buying music by ril. Find ril at BANDCAMP. Thank you.