The paradox of full range engagements and the principles of misconduct

When you think the hilarity will subside around here, it gets even more paradoxical and oxymoron all the same:

Scientists slam Trump administration climate report as a ‘farce’ full of misinformation

Scientists slam Trump administration climate report as a ‘farce’ full of misinformation https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/01/trump-epa-climate-change-report?CMP=share_btn_url

Dessler said scientists are obliged to engage with the full range of evidence, even if it contradicts their initial assumptions. Ignoring this principle “can rise to the level of scientific misconduct”, he said.

My readers, wherever you are in the world, I will never want to hide a book like CTTD in print versions behind some backdoor at a Bluesie jazz comedy fest. Do not make me something other than human and humane with my books. Give your support. CTTD has been a lesson in law. Justice must be achieved. Give your support and hold on to the relativity.

PLEASE DONATE TO SUPPORT THE FREE BOOKS FOR LIFE CAUSE
You may choose to donate whatever you may through lomopeju@protonmail.com PayPal handle. You may also support by buying music by ril. Find ril at BANDCAMP. Thank you.

Unknown's avatar

Published by ade ronke

I am a writing, music, philosophy, and science enthusiast recovering from trauma and homelessness. If you find anything useful here, it is free. If you're here for my work, your support mean a lot to me. Any support is appreciated and goes toward ensuring great things are available without prejudice, limiting or unsurmountable paywall of class or pedigree. Please support through the free books for life cause links. Or explore and purchase music by ril on Bandcamp. Thanks for being here.