A new amendment: keep science out of politics?

My readers, fart has more worth than what the laureates are telling you.  What is the precursor to a fart? And you realize that there is a precursor to the precursor of a fart. In other words, there is a causation before the effect(now casual) for the  effect that makes the effect that makes a fart we can ignore because Einstein told us we can. We then make that effect the causation. Did you realize we’re dealing with complexes here? 

Equivalences exists so we can solve a problem. Without the equation, it’s terms and parameters, we can’t solve a problem. There are complex equations here. Einstein got the equivalence wrong by detaching causation and assuming progression,  So in high winds, high weather and homelessness I went looking for the mere probabilistic part of suck ass spots of the possible equations, not sure how it can transformatively and differentially be an equivalence. You get the drift.

Even if you have approximations with the wave over the line, you still get suck ass. You must encounter the diagonal which is consequential and not-equal(not inequality). You see my readers, if this is what the laureates are telling you she’s gonna achieve, you’re f**ked from here beyond the moon and beyond in every probabilistic potentiality. They’re feeding you nothing for votes. And this is a terrible horror of modern science. This is wrong. I raise a worthwhile campaign for a new amendment to keep science out of politics. I call Sasquatch Bullshit.bI may be joking. Am i?